CO129-219 Foreign Office 1884 — Page 375

Marquis Trany should be told that the Extradition

ศ

1873

Many

Arts 1570, do not apply to the China-

that the Treaty of Tientsin dous net prescribe the manner in wheel the question of the peod * & juilt required by art. XXX out that H. Mr. Gutt connect admit that

o the heat

رہا

is wh

There on farmed

X

either

the Cotmail Adinance to enext

conclusive expecially

the opinion of the magistrale

4-1

when further lindince is for theeming after the magistrate has committed

where extradition in

Dy

Discharged the person

sought-

as gard

the nature of the proof & quilt intender w the heaty without I "depporn that it magh

I conceded that it doves hit mean

nels abrilute proof

x du

AL

Low thap 58.57 where the judgeme

wuld be necessary speaks

and that it may June Jenne

to support a price Encrition

I said that in the case in question the first

aus m. (concil

are not sateised that there

"was presumption proof of the filt of the 11

accused pers.

fot

pportunit

[ If it is true that the Chemise authenties had no of rebatting the further eindran haught before the Eni Anant

I have a reasonthe ground of complaint.

витрар

ow that point without seeing They)

They decen

and it magh but to fap

rother in resching the site we the reavest o

in the frowned, décline

The accused pences.

Ew 5.1

X

Ingen bat at & we might add that Section 3 of the Mimani to

if there affian Which Manguis Tory refers Emporre. The Imagistrate effeccatifying

to him to be Installa Cause for believing the person & han committier the Offene to commit him to prison & instil the Jader shall reccior some other

Gister

from the Governo relation to the

discharge

the

& the farther

detentions,

374

- Kansmission pouch person" the Chinace Authirties; that Governor before dinding & discharge prisoner stund Committed by the magistrate,

Cammy

hate, Would Naturally

Consult his Council, and that de (as in Grevine Mint )

131011

I agree.

Keut Jan

D. Jan. 18.

JZ-

གེ - ::་ བ